Introduction
This note presents a series of charts which provide an overview of Kyrgyzstan’s recent public financial management (PFM) performance based on this country’s 2015 Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) assessment. Comparisons are made between Kyrgyzstan’s performance and the performance of the other twenty-three countries that had PEFA assessments published in 2014-2015. All analyses have been prepared using results reported from using the 2011 PEFA methodology.
Overall PFM performance
Individual country PFM performance has been determined by applying the following points scale to reported individual performance indicator (PI) scores as presented in Table 1. No points were allocated to PIs that were not scored because either data was unavailable, a D score was given or the PI was not applicable.
Table 1: PI scoring methodology
PEFA PI score |
Points allocated |
A |
3 |
B+ |
2.5 |
B |
2 |
C+ |
1.5 |
C |
1 |
D+ |
.5 |
D |
0 |
The graph in Figure 1 below shows Kyrgyzstan’s overall score was ranked ninth out of the twenty-four countries.
Figure 1: Aggregate PEFA scores for 24 countries
Details of the distribution of overall country scores across PFM performance categories, as determined by PFMConnect, are presented in Table 2. Kyrgyzstan’s overall score was 49.5 points.
Table 2: Distribution of country PFM performance levels
PFM performance | Overall Scores | Number of countries |
Very strong | 66.37-84 | 0 |
Strong | 49.57-66.36 | 8 |
Moderate | 32.77-49.56 | 7 |
Weak | 15.97-32.76 | 8 |
Very weak | 0-15.96 | 1 |
Total | 24 |
Kyrgyzstan’s overall PFM performance is classified as “moderate”.
PI performance
The graph in Figure 2 below shows the scores for Kyrgyzstan individual PIs compared with the average score recorded for each PI across the twenty-four PEFA assessments we have studied.
Figure 2: Kyrgyzstan PI score comparisons
Download a pdf version of Figure 2 here (Kyrgyzstan PIs) to review individual PI scores in more detail.
Twenty-eight PIs were assessed. Nineteen PIs had scores above the country average, one PI had a score equal to the country average whilst eight PIs had scores below the country average.
Performance across key PFM activities
The graph in Figure 3 below shows the average scores for the six key PFM activities compared with the average score recorded for these activities across the twenty-four country PEFA assessments we have studied.
Figure 3: Kyrgyzstan key PFM activity comparisons
All six key PFM activities recorded scores above the country average.
PEFA ASSESSMENT
You can download the 2015 PEFA assessment for Kyrgyzstan here.
Magnificent job! http://hudhfgdfg434tgag.tumblr.com/
Thank you William.
John Leonardo
Principal
PFMConnect
wow, awesome post.Really thank you! Great. http://hudhfgdfg434tgag.tumblr.com/ – Roesser
Thanks-a-mundo for the post. Fantastic.